Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This book examines the anticolonial movement forged by Indian migrant workers, intellectuals, and students in North America during the early twentieth century and the collaborative efforts of US, Canadian, and British officials to crush it. Exploring the dialectical relationship between Indian anticolonialism and state antiradicalism, it argues that Indian anticolonial resistance was densely interwoven with anti-Asian exclusionary campaigns and state antiradical practices and that Indian anticolonialists served as catalysts for the implementation of restrictive US immigration and antiradical laws and the expansion of state power in early twentieth-century India and America. This transnational dialectic of anticolonial activism and state repression reveals how anti-Asian racism and antiradicalism were mutually constituted and simultaneously developed into a discourse of national security. Situated at the intersections of the British and US empires, Indians were constantly watched by US, Canadian, and British officials. The transnational dimensions of Indian anticolonialism and of US and British surveillance and repression engendered a broad inter-imperial collaboration that curbed the threat of the British Raj being overthrown during the Great War and laid the foundation for their joint suppression of radical political movements during the interwar period and beyond. Indian migrants understood their struggles against racial exclusion and political repression in North America as part of a broader movement against white supremacy and colonialism and articulated radical visions of anticolonialism that called not only for the end of British rule in India but for the forging of democracies across the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".