MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254309194 · doi:10.1109/grc.2007.4403153

Use of Neural Networks in Forecasting Financial Market

2007· article· en· W4254309194 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2007 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GRC 2007) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicStock Market Forecasting Methods
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceSimple (philosophy)Black–Scholes modelPoint (geometry)Financial marketCall optionArtificial intelligenceFinanceEconomicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In today's volatile financial market the demand for an accurate option price forecaster has been a focal point for researchers. The purpose of this study is to forecast option prices using neural networks. Initially simple neural network was implemented using twenty year period data from S&P 500 index call option prices. The prediction result was better than that of traditional Black-Scholes model. A hybrid neural network was developed that utilized aspects of Black- Scholes model into the neural network and tested against the traditional approach and simple neural network. The hybrid neural network outperformed performance of the tradition forecasting model and improved prediction results of simple neural networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.243
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it