MétaCan
Menu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2015
Typearticle
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAmerican History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernityFrontierAdventureDisappointmentHistoryEmpirePessimismOptimal distinctiveness theoryHollywoodEthnologyArt historyAncient historyLawPolitical sciencePhilosophyArchaeologyPsychologyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

 OHQ vol. 116, no. 3 often, in contrast, looked persistently inward while searching for a distinctively American frontier, a place like nowhere else on earth” (p. 85). Wrobel places this shift at the precise momentwhenAmericansbeganto perceive the American frontier as closed.Thus,travelers like John Muir, Jack London, and Theodore Roosevelt sought “new frontiers of adventure well beyond the geographic borders of their newly frontierless nation” (p. 86). Where Wrobel argues that London was a culturally sensitive traveller, one who acted more as a “cultural ambassador than as an agent of empire,” he notes the “imperial tone” characteristic of Roosevelt’s writing (p. 91, 99). Yet Wrobel’s keen analysis links Roosevelt’s accounts of his travels in Africa with his earlier writings about theAmericanWest to show how Roosevelt connected these as like “frontiers.” Wrobel also smartly develops Americans’ growing concern with modernity. If Roosevelt seemed preoccupied with its possible emasculating effects, Wrobel shows that automotive travel writers shared at least some of his anxieties. Setting out to chronicle the West’s “automotive frontiers,” some writers expressed their disappointment in a region they perceived as“despoiled by modernity”(p. 115–116). Because modernity seemed to act as an“acid”that threatened to erode regional difference and distinctiveness of theWest,Wrobel argues, some writers sought out “untouched” landscapes for their travels. Not surprisingly, writers identified the American Southwest and its inhabitants as retaining “authenticity ” in the face of encroaching sameness and directed readers to visit the region before it succumbed. Yet, as Wrobel shows, such pessimism transformed in the Depression era, as travel writers like Ernie Pyle took to theWest to “paint the landscapes of other people’s lives. . . . and sometimes just the landscapes themselves” (p.139–140).For Pyle and others,“theWest was still very much alive and culturally vibrant”(p. 138). To further illustrate the impulse of travel writers to demonstrate America’s “regional richness,”Wrobel points effectively to the Federal Writers’ Project’s American Guide Series, which produced a series of travel guides that provided “cultural inventories” of the places they described and, in the process, confirmed the distinctiveness and continued vibrancy of the American West (p. 122–23). In challenging historians to rethink their “assumptions about how the West was presented to America and to the world,” Wrobel makes important contributions to the historiography of the American West (p. 14). Readers will also appreciate his careful reconsideration of travel writing produced in this period. Wrobel not only uses this material to make a persuasive case that travel writers often viewed the West as an alternately global and distinctivelyAmerican space,he also redirects readers’ attention to this often overlooked and perhaps misunderstood literature. Jennifer Thigpen Washington State University WHEN MONEY GREW ON TREES: A.B. HAMMOND AND THE AGE OF THE TIMER BARON by Greg Gordon University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, 2014. Illustrations, maps, notes, bibliography,index. 505 pages. $29.95 cloth. This carefully crafted biography of Northwest timber king A. B. Hammond is a fascinating case study of the commodification of the vast timber resources of the Pacific Northwest and northern California.The author,Greg Gordon, has skillfully used the career of timber baron Hammond to reveal how the business methods of industrial capitalism combined with new technologies and questionable land acquisition strategies created an efficient and profitable means of converting virgin, old growth forests into highly marketable products. In 1864, Hammond began his long career in the  Reviews timber industry in New Brunswick, Canada, as a teenage logger.Seeking a more prosperous future, he quickly moved on to the gold fields of Montana.Hammond soon found his future not in mining but in mercantile, banking, and timber endeavors. Over a twenty-year period he became one of the leading businessmen and power brokers of Montana. In the 1890s, seeking ever-larger fields of opportunity, he began focusing his business interests on the vast timber resources of Oregon and northern California. Using questionable and often blatantly fraudulent methods,he and his partners acquired vast stands of timber on the public domain.Over the next thirty years,to his great profit,Hammond applied his capital and business acumen to vertically integrate every aspect of the lumber business from...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.011
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it