MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255714343 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2000.951607

Limitations of criteria for testing transistor circuits for multiple DC operating points

2002· article· en· W4255714343 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistorTransistorJacobian matrix and determinantElectronic circuitEquivalent circuitComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Value (mathematics)Topology (electrical circuits)MathematicsElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringStatisticsVoltageControl (management)Applied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Addresses the problem of determining whether a transistor circuit possesses multiple dc operating points. We investigate how the sign change of the determinant corresponding to the Jacobian matrix associated with circuit equations can be used to indicate the number of dc operating points in a transistor circuit. We give circuit examples that illustrate that these criteria may not be reliable, and show that resistor values that determine the number of a circuit's dc operating points, may or may not affect the value of the calculated determinant. Even if the mere existence of a feedback structure depends on whether a particular resistor is open- or short-circuited, the resistor value may not affect the value of the determinant. Hence, the determinant criteria is not always indicative of the number of a circuit's dc operating points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.313
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.026 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical Methods and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207