MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256153779 · doi:10.1057/9780230579538_1

Introduction

2007· book-chapter· en· W4256153779 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNational Identity and Symbolism
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureThe RenaissanceCompromiseEuropean unionEuropean commissionBaroqueCurrencyArtHistoryEconomic historyEconomyPolitical scienceArt historyVisual artsLawInternational tradeEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When the European Union (EU) created a monetary union with a single currency, giving birth to the euro in January 1999 — the common currency began to circulate in January 2002 — a brilliant compromise on banknotes and coins was reached that respected the history and identity of Europe and the member states. According to the European Commission: The euro banknotes … were inspired by the theme ‘Ages and styles of Europe.’ Each denomination received a single design common to all euro area countries. They depict the architectural styles of seven periods in Europe’s cultural history: classical for the €5, Romanesque for the €10, Gothic for the €20, Renaissance for the €50, baroque and rococo for the €100, 19th century iron and glass architecture for the €200 and modern 20th century architecture for the €500.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it