MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256252648 · doi:10.1598/rrq.41.2.6

INTERNATIONAL REPORTS ON LITERACY RESEARCH

2006· article· en· W4256252648 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReading Research Quarterly · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Studies and Philology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiteracyReading (process)CitationInformation literacyComputer scienceLibrary scienceMathematics educationSociologyLinguisticsPsychologyPedagogyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CLLRNet is a member of the Networks of Centres of Excellence and is funded by the Canadian Government in the Medical, Natural, Engineering, and Social Sciences.Since its establishment in the fall of 2000, CLLRNet has grown to include 120 researchers and more than 175 students from 11 disciplines at 29 institutions across Canada.The vision of CLLRNet is to improve language and literacy skills in Canadian children, enabling them to contribute more effectively to the social and economic life of their communities.This vision beckons language and literacy educators to help understand and address these challenges.The research projects within CLLRNet are organized around five integrated themes: (1) biological factors underlying the development of language and literacy skills; (2) sensory processes and environment; (3) language development; (4) literacy acquisition and development; and (5) social, economic, and program influences (family, schools, and communities).Although several major studies are presently being conducted at CLLRNet, this report focuses on three studies.1. Across themes 1 to 4: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate the neurodevelopment of children as ground-breaking research.Reading is a complex cognitive skill that requires the coordination of multiple regions of the brain.Although functional activation studies highlight the cortical brain regions associated with cognitive tasks such as reading, they do not directly address the underlying neural connections necessary for efficient performance of this task.Adults with reading disabilities have demonstrated lower white matter connectivity, but it is not known whether this relationship between neuronal wiring and reading performance is also evident in younger readers.Thirty-two children between the ages of 9 and 12 years completed the Word Identification subtest of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test with scores ranging from 72 to 129 and underwent a noninvasive MRI brain scan.An index of brain connectivity derived from diffusion tensor MRI (fractional anisotropy) was correlated, using SPM software, with reading ability.Preliminary findings suggested that there were correlations with regional brain structures over a wide range of reading ability even within a population of readers not evidencing problems in learning to read.A follow-up study on a well-defined

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it