MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256346650 · doi:10.2118/2002-072-ea

Novel Expanding Solvent-SAGD Process “ES-SAGD ”

2002· article· en· W4256346650 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)SolventChemistryMaterials scienceComputer scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) has been successfully tested in field pilots and commercial applications are currently underway by a number of oil companies. The process yields higher oil rates and faster reservoir depletion, as compared to other in-situ oil recovery processes. Current developments of the SAGD process are aimed at improving oil rates, improving oil-to- steam ratios "OSR", reducing energy and minimizing water disposal requirements. In addition to SAGD, progress has been made in the development of solvent injection processes. These processes result in lower oil rates and energy requirements as compared to SAGD. At the present time, limited field results are available for the solvent processes to allow for adequate evaluation of field performance. A novel approach for combining the benefits of steam and solvents in the recovery of heavy oil and bitumen has been undertaken at the Alberta Research Council (ARC). A newly patented Expanding Solvent-SAGD "ES-SAGD" process has been developed. The process has been successfully field-tested and resulted in improved oil rates, improved OSR and lower energy and water requirements as compared to SAGD. The paper discusses the concept and laboratory testing of the ES-SAGD process. Introduction The most promising in-situ thermal recovery technology is the SAGD process. In this process, two horizontal wells separated by a vertical distance are placed near the bottom of the formation. The top horizontal well is used to inject steam and the bottom well is used to collect the produced liquids (formation water, condensate, and oil). Following the success of the UTF project at Fort McMurray, Alberta, a number of field pilots are in progress in other heavy oil reservoirs in western Canada (Alberta and Saskatchewan), and around the world. These pilots tested the use of surface accessed horizontal wells and extended SAGD applications to problem reservoirs. These reservoirs often have lower permeabilities, are deeper, have bottom water transition zones, with initial gas-saturated "live" oil and top water / gas caps. In Alberta, the success of these pilots has led to a number of commercial SAGD projects that are currently underway. Current developments of the SAGD process at ARC are aimed at improving oil rates, improving OSR, reducing energy and minimizing water disposal requirements. Progress has been made in the development of combined steam-solvent injection processes, a novel approach for combining the benefits of steam and solvents in the recovery of heavy oil and bitumen. A newly patented(1) Expanding Solvent-SAGD "ES-SAGD" process has been successfully field-tested and has resulted in improved oil rates and OSR, and lower energy and water requirements as compared to conventional SAGD. The ES-SAGD concept and laboratory testing using the high pressure/high temperature experimental facilities at ARC are presented in this paper. THE ES-SAGD CONCEPT Figure 1 illustrates the ES-SAGD concept. In this concept, a hydrocarbon additive at low concentration is co-injected with steam in a gravity-dominated process, similar to the SAGD process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it