Effects of Perceived Organizational Support and Leader Member Exchange on Individual Risk Taking
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
People’s relationships with their organization and their managers have significant effects on their work and their workplace attitudes. In this paper we look at the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS), leader member exchange (LMX), and risk taking. Workers with high levels of POS and LMX have more organizational commitment, have lower absenteeism and turnover rates, and exhibit more citizenship behaviour. We hypothesize that the higher the level of POS and LMX the more likely a person will be to take constructive versus destructive risk. Constructive risk is defined as risk involved in innovation and creativity, and is therefore desirable for organizations. This paper also looks at the links between Perceived Organizational Support and Leader Member Exchange, and at which of these factors is more influential on risk taking. This will allow organizations to best allocate their time and energy on initiatives linked to raising POS and LMX to get the highest return. This paper reflects initial findings of three separate studies looking at POS, LMX and risk taking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it