MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281256711 · doi:10.35945/gb.2022.13.005

VARIATIONS OF PRODUCTION FACTORS THEORY

2022· article· en· W4281256711 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobalization and Business · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Theory and Institutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMercantilismProtectionismDivision of labourEconomicsProduction (economics)Harmony (color)Neoclassical economicsFactors of productionComparative advantageTrade theoryFree tradeInternational tradeMacroeconomicsMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper discusses the influence of the proportions of production factors on the establishment of public equilibrium. The theory of production factors occupies an important place in the history of economic thought. The creator of the theory of factors is considered to be the famous French economist Jean Baptiste Say (1767-1832). J. B. Say campaigned against mercantilism and protectionism and advocated a policy of free trade. Factor theory finds significant application in the international division of labor. Another French economist, Frédéric Bastiat, developed the theory of economic harmony. In this theory F. Bastiat sought to reach an economic agreement between different groups of the society, through their cooperation. Canadian engineer-technologist P. Monsarov developed a theory of four factors. Nowadays, Heckcher-Ohlin Theory is widely used in the international division of labor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it