MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281256711 · doi:10.35945/gb.2022.13.005

VARIATIONS OF PRODUCTION FACTORS THEORY

2022· article· en· W4281256711 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jemal Kharitonashvili

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobalization and Business · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Theory and Institutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMercantilismProtectionismDivision of labourEconomicsProduction (economics)Harmony (color)Neoclassical economicsFactors of productionComparative advantageTrade theoryFree tradeInternational tradeMacroeconomicsMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper discusses the influence of the proportions of production factors on the establishment of public equilibrium. The theory of production factors occupies an important place in the history of economic thought. The creator of the theory of factors is considered to be the famous French economist Jean Baptiste Say (1767-1832). J. B. Say campaigned against mercantilism and protectionism and advocated a policy of free trade. Factor theory finds significant application in the international division of labor. Another French economist, Frédéric Bastiat, developed the theory of economic harmony. In this theory F. Bastiat sought to reach an economic agreement between different groups of the society, through their cooperation. Canadian engineer-technologist P. Monsarov developed a theory of four factors. Nowadays, Heckcher-Ohlin Theory is widely used in the international division of labor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobalization and BusinessSame topicEconomic Theory and InstitutionsFrench-language works237,207