MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281386400 · doi:10.1002/cpz1.427

Triplet‐Primed PCR Assays for Accurate Screening of <i>FMR1</i> CGG Repeat Expansion and Genotype Verification

2022· article· en· W4281386400 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmpliconFMR1Fragile X syndromeBiologyGeneticsMelting curve analysisMolecular biologyMultiplex ligation-dependent probe amplificationPolymerase chain reactionLocus (genetics)High Resolution MeltSouthern blotCapillary electrophoresisGenotypeAlleleGeneExon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fragile X syndrome and other fragile X-associated disorders are caused by the full-mutation (>200 copies) and premutation (55 to 200 copies) expansion, respectively, of the CGG short tandem repeat in the fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 (FMR1) gene. Clinical diagnostic laboratories use Southern blot analysis and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based tests to detect and/or size the FMR1 CGG repeats. The development of sensitive and high-throughput triplet-primed PCR (TP-PCR) assays has diminished the need to subject all samples to Southern blot analysis, which is both labor- and time-intensive. In this article, we describe two direct TP-PCR (dTP-PCR) assays for the detection of FMR1 CGG repeat expansions. We outline a protocol that is based on melting curve analysis of dTP-PCR amplicons for a rapid and cost-effective first-tier screening and identification of individuals with premutation and full-mutation expansions. We also describe a protocol that employs capillary electrophoresis to resolve the dTP-PCR amplicon fragments and to estimate the repeat sizes of normal (5 to 44 copies), intermediate (45 to 54 copies), and premutation alleles, as well as to detect full mutations and determine the structure of the FMR1 alleles. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Direct triplet-primed PCR master mix preparation and amplification of the FMR1 CGG repeat locus for melting curve analysis Basic Protocol 2: Melting curve analysis of direct triplet-primed PCR amplicons on the Rotor-Gene Q MD × 5plex high-resolution melt platform Alternate Protocol: Melting curve analysis of direct triplet-primed PCR amplicons on the LightCycler 480 system Basic Protocol 3: Generation of direct triplet-primed PCR melting curve analysis profiles Basic Protocol 4: Direct triplet-primed PCR master mix preparation and amplification of the FMR1 CGG repeat locus for capillary electrophoresis Basic Protocol 5: Generation of control FMR1 plasmids for direct triplet-primed PCR melting curve analysis Basic Protocol 6: Sanger sequencing assay to verify FMR1 CGG repeat size and structure of plasmid DNA controls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it