MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281493777 · doi:10.3390/math10111813

Remote Geotechnical Monitoring of a Buried Oil Pipeline

2022· article· en· W4281493777 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostPipeline transportEnvironmental scienceSoil waterPipeline (software)Geotechnical engineeringMeteorologySoil scienceHydrology (agriculture)GeologyComputer scienceEnvironmental engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extensive but remote oil and gas fields in Canada and Russia require extremely long pipelines. Global warming and local anthropogenic effects drive the deepening of seasonal thawing of cryolithozone soils and enhance pathological processes such as frost heave, thermokarst, and thermal erosion. These processes lead to a reduction in the subgrade capacity of the soils, causing changes in the spatial position of the pipelines, consequently increasing the number of accidents. Oil operators are compelled to monitor the daily temperatures of unevenly heated soils along pipeline routes. However, they are confronted with the problem of separating anthropogenic heat losses from seasonal temperature fluctuations. To highlight heat losses, we propose a short-term prediction approach to a transformed multidimensional dataset. First, we define the temperature intervals according to the classification of permafrost to generate additional features that sharpen seasonal and permafrost conditions, as well as the timing of temperature measurement. Furthermore, linear and nonlinear uncorrelated features are extracted and scaled. The second step consists of selecting a training sample, learning, and adjusting the additive regression model. Forecasts are then made from the test sample to assess the accuracy of the model. The forecasting procedure is provided by the three-component model named Prophet. Prophet fits linear and nonlinear functions to define the trend component and Fourier series to define the seasonal component; the third component, responsible for the abnormal days (when the heating regime is changed for some reason), could be defined by an analyst. Preliminary statistical analysis shows that the subsurface frozen soils containing the oil pipeline are mostly unstable, especially in the autumn season. Based upon the values of the error metrics, it is determined that the most accurate forecast is obtained on a three-month uniform time grid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it