Modeling Combined Operation of Engine and Torque Converter for Improved Vehicle Powertrain’s Complex Control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes an alternative model for describing the hydro-mechanical drive operation of the automatic transmissions. The study is aimed at preparing a reliable model that meets the requirements of sufficient informativeness and rapidity to, basically, be used as a model for optimized control. The study relevance is stipulated by the need for simple and precise models ensuring minimal computational costs in model predictive control (MPC) procedures. The paper proposes a method for coordinating the engine’s control and operating modes, with the torque converter (TC) operating mode, based on the criteria of angular acceleration derivative (jerk), which fosters including the angular acceleration in the state vector for using the optimal control. The latter provides stronger prediction quality than using only the crankshaft angular speed criterion. This moment comprises a study novelty. Additionally, the proposed approach can be helpful in tasks of powertrain automation, autonomous vehicles’ integrated control, elaboration of control algorithms, co-simulations, and real-time applications. The paper material is structured by the modeling stages, including mathematics and simulations, data preparation, testing and validation, virtual experiments, analysis of results, and conclusions. The essence of the problem, goals, and objectives are first presented, followed by the overview of main approaches in modeling the automatic transmission elements. The internal combustion engine (ICE), torque converter, drivetrain, tires, and translational dynamics mathematical models are determined and discussed in detail. The proposed approach convergence on decomposing the indicators of powertrain aggregates by derivatives is demonstrated. The considered method was simulated by using the data of the Audi A4 Quattro. The gear shifting control algorithm was described in detail, and a series of virtual tests for the composed model were carried out. The comparative analysis of the results for the conventional and advanced models of the automatic transmission’s hydro-mechanical drive were performed. The differences of the model outputs were discussed. The approach advantages were noted, as well as the options for extending the proposed technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".