MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281558663 · doi:10.3390/vehicles4020030

Modeling Combined Operation of Engine and Torque Converter for Improved Vehicle Powertrain’s Complex Control

2022· article· en· W4281558663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVehicles · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicMechanical Systems and Engineering
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPowertrainTorque converterCrankshaftTorqueJerkDrivetrainComputer scienceControl engineeringAccelerationMoment (physics)Control theory (sociology)Vehicle dynamicsAutomotive engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Clutch

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an alternative model for describing the hydro-mechanical drive operation of the automatic transmissions. The study is aimed at preparing a reliable model that meets the requirements of sufficient informativeness and rapidity to, basically, be used as a model for optimized control. The study relevance is stipulated by the need for simple and precise models ensuring minimal computational costs in model predictive control (MPC) procedures. The paper proposes a method for coordinating the engine’s control and operating modes, with the torque converter (TC) operating mode, based on the criteria of angular acceleration derivative (jerk), which fosters including the angular acceleration in the state vector for using the optimal control. The latter provides stronger prediction quality than using only the crankshaft angular speed criterion. This moment comprises a study novelty. Additionally, the proposed approach can be helpful in tasks of powertrain automation, autonomous vehicles’ integrated control, elaboration of control algorithms, co-simulations, and real-time applications. The paper material is structured by the modeling stages, including mathematics and simulations, data preparation, testing and validation, virtual experiments, analysis of results, and conclusions. The essence of the problem, goals, and objectives are first presented, followed by the overview of main approaches in modeling the automatic transmission elements. The internal combustion engine (ICE), torque converter, drivetrain, tires, and translational dynamics mathematical models are determined and discussed in detail. The proposed approach convergence on decomposing the indicators of powertrain aggregates by derivatives is demonstrated. The considered method was simulated by using the data of the Audi A4 Quattro. The gear shifting control algorithm was described in detail, and a series of virtual tests for the composed model were carried out. The comparative analysis of the results for the conventional and advanced models of the automatic transmission’s hydro-mechanical drive were performed. The differences of the model outputs were discussed. The approach advantages were noted, as well as the options for extending the proposed technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it