MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281620402 · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2022.100507

Disease mapping and innovation: A history from wood-block prints to Web 3.0

2022· review· en· W4281620402 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePatterns · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)DashboardComputer scienceWorld Wide WebPoint (geometry)Data scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a point in the transition of publicly available data and the means of its presentation. With syndromic mapping and new systems of data collection and distribution at all levels, previously privileged materials are now generally available. At the same time, the means of their analysis and presentation are being transformed by new systems of digital collaboration and presentation. With the coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19) dashboard as an example, the history of both data and their presentation is presented as the backcloth against which the evolving systems of data collection and graphic presentation can be understood in a world of interactive research and Web 3.0.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it