MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281737658 · doi:10.31234/osf.io/as2eb

Menstrual cycle-associated symptoms and workplace productivity in US employees: a cross-sectional survey of users of the Flo mobile phone app

2022· preprint· en· W4281737658 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicTechnostress in Professional Settings
Canadian institutionsOPKO Health (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenstrual cycleAbsenteeismProductivityPsychological interventionMoodmHealthMedicinePsychologyEnvironmental healthGerontologyNursingClinical psychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Mood and physical symptoms related to the menstrual cycle greatly affect women’s productivity at work and often lead to absenteeism. However, employer-led initiatives to tackle these issues are lacking. Digital health interventions focused on women’s health (such as the Flo mobile phone app) could help fill this gap given their anonymity, scalability and accessibility. Objective: We aimed to 1) measure the impact of disturbances related to the menstrual cycle on work-related productivity in users of the Flo app; 2) characterize levels of support and benefits women receive in the workplace and 3) explore whether the Flo app could help mitigate the impact of issues related to the menstrual cycle on productivity and absenteeism. Methods: 1867 users of the Flo app participated in a survey exploring 1) the extent to which their menstrual cycle negatively impacts their workplace productivity, including whether menstrual cycle-related symptoms led to absence from work in the previous 12 months; 2) whether Flo users feel supported by their manager and whether they receive specific benefits regarding issues related to their cycle and 3) the role of Flo in the management of menstrual cycle symptoms, preparedness, bodily awareness, openness with others, perceived support and mood.Results: The majority of Flo users reported a moderate to severe impact of their cycle on workplace productivity. 45.2% of the respondents reported absenteeism, with an average of 5.8 days of work missed due to their cycle. 48.4% reported not receiving any support from their manager and 94.6% said they were not provided with any specific benefit for issues related to their menstrual cycle. 75.6% declared they want such benefits. Users stated that the Flo app helped them with the management of menstrual cycle symptoms (68.7%), preparedness and bodily awareness (88.7%), openness with others (52.5%) and feeling supported (77.6%). Furthermore, users who reported the most positive impact of the Flo app were 18-25% less likely to report an impact of their menstrual cycle on their productivity and 12-18% less likely to take days off work for issues related to their cycle.Conclusions: The menstrual cycle can have a significant effect on workplace productivity and absenteeism, and resources available to employees are scarce. Digital health apps, such as the Flo app, could equip individuals with tools to better cope with issues related to their menstrual cycle and facilitate discussions around menstrual health in the workplace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTechnostress in Professional SettingsFrench-language works237,207