MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282584684 · doi:10.1038/s41405-022-00111-x

Prevalence of Molar-incisor hypomineralization in Iranian children – A systematic review and narrative synthesis

2022· review· en· W4282584684 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBDJ Open · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Dental Protein Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGolestan University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsMolarMedicineDentistryIncisorPaediatric dentistryOrthodontics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Molar-incisor hypomineralization is a developmental defect of enamel with clinical features vary from demarcated opacities to severe tissue breakdown which calls for considerable preventive and interceptive measures. The aim of this article was to systematically review the literature on the prevalence of MIH in Iran and highlight the condition in Iranian children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of literature was conducted in Scopus, Pubmed, Ovid, Embase, Web of Science, and Google-Scholar as well as national Iranian database and digital archives of dental schools from the beginning of 2000 to the end of 2021 for published and unpublished studies. Data from cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies on prevalence of molar-incisor hypomineralization among 6-13-year-old children was gathered, using the following MeSH terms and keywords and their Persian equivalents: Prevalence, Hypomineralisation, Hypomineralization, MIH, "molar incisor", "molar-incisor", "cheese molars", "Hypomineralised first permanent molars", "Hypomineralized first permanent molars", "developmental defects of enamel", "enamel developmental defects", Iran*. Methodological quality and the risk of bias of quantitative studies was assessed using a modified version of Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Due to the considerable clinical and statistical heterogeneity of the included studies, pooling of data through meta-analysis was not possible. Therefore, a descriptive synthesis of data was performed. RESULTS: Fifteen cross-sectional studies with a total number of 12011 participants were included in the systematic review. The prevalence of MIH ranged from 5.1% to 25.6%. All of the included studies were at a moderate risk of bias (NOS of 4-6). The lowest prevalence of MIH was reported in Kerman (5.14%) and the highest in Tehran (25.6%). Substantial methodological, clinical and statistical heterogeneity was observed. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to systematically review the available literature on MIH prevalence in Iran. However, the present review has some limitations such as limited number of included studies, large heterogeneity of the research, and moderate quality of included studies. Further high-quality research is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.782

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it