MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282843450 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzac072.023

Development of an Artificial Intelligence System to Monitor Digital Marketing of Unhealthy Food to Children: Research Protocol

2022· article· en· W4282843450 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood marketingDigital marketingSocial mediaMarketingSocial marketingDigital mediaBusinessCovertInfluencer marketingAdvertisingComputer scienceMarketing managementRelationship marketingWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unhealthy food marketing to children adversely affects their diet quality and health. The negative impacts of this marketing may be amplified on digital media, which allows industry to use artificial intelligence (AI) to market unhealthy food to children in covert ways. Health Canada is developing regulations to prohibit digital marketing of unhealthy food that appeals to children <13 years. However, reliance on adults to manually assess food marketing to children on digital media has limited understanding of key targets for policy and capacity to monitor policy adherence. To address these gaps, we are developing an AI system to monitor marketing of unhealthy food to children on digital media, including websites, YouTube, social media and mobile gaming apps. Our web and mobile scrapers continuously collect marketing instances that may be viewed by individuals in Canada on websites and social media applications popular with children. This has allowed us to accumulate a database of > 615,000 marketing instances. The AI system extracts features from each marketing instance to determine whether foods are present, and if so, whether they are unhealthy according to Health Canada's standards (based on the presence of added saturated fat, added sodium and/or free sugars). Next, the AI system uses a supervised machine learning model to assess whether child appealing marketing techniques are present. In the final step, the system integrates all of the data collected to determine whether a given marketing instance features unhealthy foods and appeals to children. The system can be applied to monitor the extent and nature of digital food marketing to children internationally. It can also be retrained to monitor adherence to country-specific policy. This is a protocol paper so there are no results. The AI system provides a scalable, objective and reproducible manner to identify digital marketing of unhealthy food that appeals to children across the digital marketing landscape. The system can assist researchers and policy makers to study children's exposure to digital marketing of unhealthy food and its impacts, and to monitor adherence to policy that restricts this marketing. Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it