MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282978401 · doi:10.4271/2022-01-0984

An Efficient Methodology to Predict the Dynamic Instabilities of a Frictional System

2022· article· en· W4282978401 on OpenAlexaff
Farouk Maaboudallah, Noureddine Atalla

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBrake Systems and Friction Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stochastic Finite Elements Method (SFEM) is applied in many fields. For instance, in frictional systems, it helps quantify uncertainties about the parameters controlling the involved process and thus, provides a more reliable prediction of the dynamic instabilities. Usually, SFEM is coupled with sensitivity theory to investigate the effect of a given input on the output. However, the available methods which often couple Monte-Carlo (MC) algorithm with the Finite Element (FE) method have a computational cost that scales linearly as a number of stochastic iteration N and input parameters k (i.e., t ~ N x k). To achieve convergence, the magnitude of N must be on the order of thousands or even millions. Hence, for a frictional system with 5 random variables and requiring 15 min of CPU time per run, the computational cost will exceed 52 days (!). Such a method cannot be applied in an industrial design framework with a high number of random variables since its CPU time becomes prohibitive. In this paper, an efficient SFEM is presented, and its performances demonstrated on a simplified disc brake system. The goal is to predict the most likely dynamic instabilities. The method is formulated to (i) reduce the computational cost while ensuring convergence and (ii) provide a reliable input-output mapping of the model which allows in turn a better prediction and investigation of the friction-induced vibration problem. The approach is based on the Fourier Sensitivity Amplitude Test (FAST) algorithm coupled with FE method through a Complex Eigenvalues Analysis (CEA). First, the uncertainties propagation is carried out using the periodic sampling approach by considering a variety of random variables (e.g., friction coefficient, Young modulus, etc.). Secondly, the random generated data are evaluated in an iterative way by mean of the CEA solver. Lastly, Fourier expansion is introduced to derive the partial variances and the variance of the model output. Based on the last decomposition, a 2D design map is used to visualize the effect of each random variable on the predicted instabilities. The obtained FAST-FE results are systematically compared with the reference approach, namely MC-FE. It is found that the inherent assumption of using a large number of samples is not more needed for reaching the stochastic convergence and thus, the estimation of the moments (i.e., the expected value, the variance and so forth). The periodic properties, carried by FAST research curve function, made it possible to propagate efficiently and within a reasonable computational cost the uncertainties upstream of the FE model. In comparison with the MC-FE, the proposed solver provides good results even when a coarser sample is used. The inefficiency of MC-FE solver is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicBrake Systems and Friction AnalysisFrench-language works237,207