MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283011735 · doi:10.1137/21m1417077

Robust Connectivity of Graphs on Surfaces

2022· article· en· W4283011735 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniwersytet Warszawski
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsVertex (graph theory)LambdaDiscrete mathematicsDegeneracy (biology)Dominating setTree (set theory)ArboricitySpanning treeInvariant (physics)GraphPlanar graph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $\Lambda(T)$ denote the set of leaves in a tree $T$. One natural problem is to look for a spanning tree $T$ of a given graph $G$ such that $\Lambda(T)$ is as large as possible. This problem is called maximum leaf number, and it is a well-known NP-hard problem. Equivalently, the same problem can be formulated as the minimum connected dominating set problem, where the task is to find a smallest subset of vertices $D\subseteq V(G)$ such that every vertex of $G$ is in the closed neighborhood of $D$. Throughout recent decades, these two equivalent problems have received considerable attention, ranging from pure graph theoretic questions to practical problems related to the construction of wireless networks. Recently, a similar but stronger notion was defined by Bradshaw, Masařík, and Stacho [Flexible list colorings in graphs with special degeneracy conditions, in Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2020), LIPIcs. Leibniz Int. Proc. Inform. 181, Schloss Dagstuhl. Leibniz-Zent. Inform., Wadern, 2020, article 31]. They introduced a new invariant for a graph $G$, called the robust connectivity and written as $\kappa_\rho(G)$, defined as the minimum value $\frac{|R \cap \Lambda (T)|}{|R|}$ taken over all nonempty subsets $R\subseteq V(G)$, where $T = T(R)$ is a spanning tree on $G$ chosen to maximize $|R \cap \Lambda(T)|$. Large robust connectivity was originally used to show flexible choosability in nonregular graphs. In this paper, we investigate some interesting properties of robust connectivity for graphs embedded in surfaces. We prove a tight asymptotic bound of $\Omega(\gamma^{-\frac{1}{r}})$ for the robust connectivity of $r$-connected graphs of Euler genus $\gamma$. Moreover, we give a surprising connection between the robust connectivity of graphs with an edge-maximal embedding in a surface and the surface connectivity of that surface, which describes to what extent large induced subgraphs of embedded graphs can be cut out from the surface without splitting the surface into multiple parts. For planar graphs, this connection provides an equivalent formulation of a long-standing conjecture of Albertson and Berman [A conjecture on planar graphs, in Graph Theory and Related Topics, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1979, p. 57], which states that every planar graph on $n$ vertices contains an induced forest of size at least $n/2$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it