SpikeConverter: An Efficient Conversion Framework Zipping the Gap between Artificial Neural Networks and Spiking Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) have recently attracted enormous research interest since their event-driven and brain-inspired structure enables low-power computation. In image recognition tasks, the best results are achieved by SNN so far utilizing ANN-SNN conversion methods that replace activation functions in artificial neural networks~(ANNs) with integrate-and-fire neurons. Compared to source ANNs, converted SNNs usually suffer from accuracy loss and require a considerable number of time steps to achieve competitive accuracy. We find that the performance degradation of converted SNN stems from the fact that the information capacity of spike trains in transferred networks is smaller than that of activation values in source ANN, resulting in less information being passed during SNN inference. To better correlate ANN and SNN for better performance, we propose a conversion framework to mitigate the gap between the activation value of source ANN and the generated spike train of target SNN. The conversion framework originates from exploring an identical relation in the conversion and exploits temporal separation scheme and novel neuron model for the relation to hold. We demonstrate almost lossless ANN-SNN conversion using SpikeConverter for VGG-16, ResNet-20/34, and MobileNet-v2 SNNs on challenging datasets including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet. Our results also show that SpikeConverter achieves the abovementioned accuracy across different network architectures and datasets using 32X - 512X fewer inference time-steps than state-of-the-art ANN-SNN conversion methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".