Cloud–Edge Collaborative Resource Allocation for Blockchain-Enabled Internet of Things: A Collective Reinforcement Learning Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Driven by numerous emerging mobile devices and various Quality-of-Service (QoS) requirements, mobile-edge computing (MEC) has been recognized as a prospective paradigm to promote the computation capability of mobile devices, as well as reduce energy overhead and service latency of applications for the Internet of Things (IoT). However, there are still some open issues in the existing research works: 1) limited network and computing resource; 2) simple or nonintelligent resource management; and 3) ignored security and reliability. In order to cope with these issues, in this article, 6G and blockchain technology are considered to improve network performance and ensure the authenticity of data sharing for the MEC-enabled IoT. Meanwhile, a novel intelligent optimization method named as collective reinforcement learning (CRL) is proposed and introduced, to realize intelligent resource allocation, meet distributed training results sharing, and avoid excessive consumption of system resources. Based on the designed network model, a cloud–edge collaborative resource allocation framework is formulated. By joint optimizing the offloading decision, block interval, and transmission power, it aims to minimize the consumption overheads of system energy and latency. Then, the formulated problem is designed as a Markov decision process, and the optimal strategy can be obtained by the CRL. Some evaluation results reveal that the system performance based on the proposed scheme outperforms other existing schemes obviously.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it