MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285089822 · doi:10.1155/2022/4700817

Discussion on the Construction of Enterprise Internal Audit Informatization

2022· article· en· W4285089822 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shenglu Li

Post-publication record

NatureRetraction
ReasonConcerns/Issues about Data;Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions;Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions;Concerns/Issues about Peer Review;Investigation by Journal/Publisher;Investigation by Third Party;Paper Mill;Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content;Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions;
Date8/9/2023 0:00
Flagged by OpenAlex?Yes

Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement; it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Technologies in Various Fields
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformatizationInternal auditInformation technology auditAuditBusinessProcess managementInformation technologyAudit trailKnowledge managementAccountingJoint auditComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the popularization and application of enterprise, internal audit has gradually emerged. Therefore, enterprises need to strengthen information technology in enterprise audit, the development of information technology in information construction, and the integration of audit information, so as to accelerate the growth of enterprises. This article mainly uses the internal audit information of insurance company A as an example to analyze the existing problems in the current audit information structure and propose relevant solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0090.011
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicAdvanced Technologies in Various FieldsFrench-language works237,207