Mitigating adversarial evasion attacks by deep active learning for medical image classification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), collaboration among institutes can help complex medical and clinical analysis of disease. Deep neural networks (DNN) require training models on large, diverse patients to achieve expert clinician-level performance. Clinical studies do not contain diverse patient populations for analysis due to limited availability and scale. DNN models trained on limited datasets are thereby constraining their clinical performance upon deployment at a new hospital. Therefore, there is significant value in increasing the availability of diverse training data. This research proposes institutional data collaboration alongside an adversarial evasion method to keep the data secure. The model uses a federated learning approach to share model weights and gradients. The local model first studies the unlabeled samples classifying them as adversarial or normal. The method then uses a centroid-based clustering technique to cluster the sample images. After that, the model predicts the output of the selected images, and active learning methods are implemented to choose the sub-sample of the human annotation task. The expert within the domain takes the input and confidence score and validates the samples for the model’s training. The model re-trains on the new samples and sends the updated weights across the network for collaboration purposes. We use the InceptionV3 and VGG16 model under fabricated inputs for simulating Fast Gradient Signed Method (FGSM) attacks. The model was able to evade attacks and achieve a high accuracy rating of 95%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it