Looking for Trouble: Informative Planning for Safe Trajectories with Occlusions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Planning a safe trajectory for an ego vehicle through an environment with occluded regions is a challenging task. Existing methods use some combination of metrics to evaluate a trajectory, either taking a worst case view or allowing for some probabilistic estimate, to eliminate or minimize the risk of collision respectively. Typically, these approaches assume occluded regions of the environment are unsafe and must be avoided, resulting in overly conservative trajectories-particularly when there are no hidden risks present. We propose a local trajectory planning algorithm which generates safe trajectories that maximize observations on un-certain regions. In particular, we seek to gain information on occluded areas that are most likely to pose a risk to the ego vehicle on its future path. Calculating the information gain is a computationally complex problem; our method approximates the maximum information gain and results in vehicle motion that remains safe but is less conservative than state-of-the-art approaches. We evaluate the performance of the proposed method within the CARLA simulator in different scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it