A Learned Bloom Filter-Assisted Scheme for Packet Classification in Software-Defined Networking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional routing technologies based on a single IP address domain faces the challenge to meet the increasing demand for network services and security. Packet classification is a technique to differentiate multi-domain network traffic in a fine-grained manner using packet header fields. Packet classification requires to operate efficiently to avoid it becoming a bottleneck in the packet routing process. Tuple space search (TSS) used in SDN supports fast rule updates but low-speed packet classification. In this paper, we propose a learned Bloom filter (LBF)-based packet classification algorithm that combines LBF and TSS to promote classification speed by avoiding invalid hash table accesses. Specifically, LBF consists of multiple RNN models and one support Bloom filter (SBF), in which the learned models are trained with the positive and negative sets, and used as a pre-filter to identify the two sets. For the filter outcomes with a negative result from learned models, SBF is constructed to perform the second filtration. To ensure efficiency of RNN and SBF, we carefully select key features to be used in RNN and SBF, which can also maintain efficient search in the final stage of hash checking. Our experimental results show that the proposed algorithm saves more memory space than Tuple space pruning (TSP) given the same false positive rate. The proposed algorithm is competitive in terms of the number of memory accesses, while achieving almost one order of magnitude improvement on pre-processing time over NeuroCuts which is an advanced decision tree classifier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".