Design and Development of RNN Anomaly Detection Model for IoT Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cybersecurity is important today because of the increasing growth of the Internet of Things (IoT), which has resulted in a variety of attacks on computer systems and networks. As the number of various IoT devices and services grows, cyber security will become an increasingly difficult issue to manage. Malicious traffic identification using deep learning techniques has emerged as a key component of network-based intrusion detection systems (IDS). Deep learning methods have been a research focus in network intrusion detection. A recurrent neural network is useful in a wide range of applications. This paper proposes a novel deep learning model for detecting anomalies in IoT networks using recurrent neural networks. The proposed model is implemented in IoT networks utilizing LSTM, BiLSTM, and GRU-based approaches for anomaly detection. A convolutional neural network can analyze input features without losing important information, making them particularly well suited for feature learning. In addition, we propose a hybrid deep learning model based on convolutional and recurrent neural networks. Finally, employing LSTM, BiLSTM, and GRU-based techniques, we propose a lightweight deep learning model for binary classification. The proposed deep learning models are validated using NSLKDD, BoT-IoT, IoT-NI, MQTT, MQTTset, IoT-23, and IoT-DS2 datasets. Our proposed binary and multiclass classification model achieved high accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score compared to current deep learning implementations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".