MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285129920 · doi:10.54364/aaiml.2022.1128

Lesion Segmentation in Paediatric Epilepsy Utilizing Deep Learning Approaches

2022· article· en· W4285129920 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEpilepsy Research Program of the Ontario Brain InstituteGovernment of OntarioNvidia
KeywordsCortical dysplasiaEpilepsyLesionFluid-attenuated inversion recoverySørensen–Dice coefficientArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceSegmentationSequence (biology)MedicineRadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingImage segmentationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is one of the most common lesions responsible for drug-resistant epilepsy, and is frequently missed by visual inspection. FCD may be amenable to surgical resection to achieve seizure freedom. By improving lesion detection the surgical outcome of these patients can be improved. Image processing techniques are a potential tool to improve the detection of FCD prior to epilepsy surgery. In this research, we propose and compare the performance of two type of models, Fully Convolutional Network (FCN) and a multi-sequence FCN to classify and segment FCD in children with drug-resistant epilepsy. This experiment utilized the volumetric T1-weighted, T2 weighted and FLAIR sequences. The whole slice FCN models were applied to each sequence separately while the multi-sequence model leverages combined information of all three sequences simultaneously. A leave-one-subject-out technique was utilized to train and evaluate the models. We evaluated subjectwise sensitivity and specificity, which corresponds to the ability of the model to classify those with or without a lesion. We also evaluated lesional sensitivity and specificity, which expresses the ability of the model to segment the lesion and the dice coefficient to evaluate lesion coverage. Our data consisted of 80 FCD subjects (56 MR-positive and 24 MR-negative) and 15 healthy controls. Performance of whole slice FCN was best on T1-weighted, followed by T2-weighted and lowest with FLAIR sequences. Multi-sequence model performed better than the T1 whole slice FCN, and detected 98% vs. 93% respectively MR-positive cases, and 92% vs. 88% respectively MR-negative cases, as well as achieved lesion coverage of 74% vs. 67% respectively for MR-positive cases and 68% vs. 64% for MR negative cases. The dice coefficient for the multi-sequence model was 57% and for whole slice FCN was 56% for MR-positive cases. In the test cohort of six new cases, the multi-sequence model detected 4 out of 6 cases where the predicted lesion had 56% overlap with the actual lesion. This work showed that deep learning methods in particular fully convolutional networks are a promising tool for classification and segmentation of FCD. Additional work is required to further improve lesion classification and segmentation, particularly for small lesions, as well as to train and test optimal algorithms on a larger multi-center dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it