MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285248925 · doi:10.1109/tdmr.2022.3175914

Reliable Circuit Design Using a Fast Incremental-Based Gate Sizing Under Process Variation

2022· article· en· W4285248925 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNegative-bias temperature instabilityCircuit reliabilityLogic gateBenchmark (surveying)Process variationReliability (semiconductor)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringAlgorithmProcess (computing)EngineeringTransistorElectrical engineeringMOSFETPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As CMOS devices become smaller, aging-induced and process variations become major issues for circuit reliability. In this paper, a statistical gate sizing method is proposed to improve the lifetime reliability of manufactured chips in the presence of process variations and aging effects. To this end, we propose a canonical first order delay model to estimate the delay degradation of a gate under negative bias temperature instability and process variations considering spatial correlations. Using the proposed gate delay model, a statistical static timing analysis method is introduced to compute the circuit delay considering the joint effect of process variation and negative bias temperature instability. To guarantee that the circuit meets the required timing constraints, we propose an incremental gate sizing technique. This technique first computes the criticality of each gate defined as the probability that a gate lies on the critical path due to negative bias temperature instability and process variations. Then, a group of gates with the highest ranking according to criticality is chosen for a gate sizing-based timing optimization. It is worth nothing that, by using the proposed statistical gate delay model, we can compute the criticality of each gate incrementally. Experimental results based on ISCAS’85 benchmark circuits show that the proposed method can improve the lifetime reliability defined as <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1.1(\mu + 3\sigma)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> of the initial delay distribution of the circuit at the expense of 8.64% area overhead. In comparison with the path-based method, the proposed approach is much faster, especially for larger circuits, which makes it a viable solution to optimize the lifetime reliability of very large-scale circuits used in industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it