An Anonymity Vulnerability in Tor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Privacy is currently one of the most concerned issues in Cyberspace. Tor is the most widely used system in the world for anonymously accessing Internet. However, Tor is known to be vulnerable to end-to-end traffic correlation attacks when an adversary is able to monitor traffic at both communication endpoints. In this paper, we present a set of novel Trapper Attacks that can be used to deanonymize user activities by both AS-level adversaries and Node-level adversaries in a Tor network. First, AS-level adversaries can exploit the occasional failures of censored network to selectively control entry guards of the Tor users. Second, the adversaries can exploit poor reliability of the Tor communication (e.g., natural churn) to compromise the exiting nodes and the anonymous path. Once the adversaries gain control of the routes, they can identify and inspect any traffic entering and leaving the Tor network, consequently, deanonymize a Tor user’s activity in the network. To demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of this attacks, we implemented a tool that can launch the proposed Trapper Attacks to automatic reveal communication relationships between a Tor user and its destinations running on a live Tor network. We also present a formal analysis framework to evaluate the integrity of the Tor network. With this framework, we successfully obtained quantitative estimates of Tor’s security vulnerability. The proposed Trapper Attacks are also designed to scale up in real-world Tor networks. Namely, it allows an adversary to perform deanonymization in honey relays effectively, and compromise the anonymity of Tor clients in real time. Our experimental results show that the proposed attacks succeed in less than 40 seconds achieving a 100% accuracy rate and a false positive rate close to 0.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".