IAGA: Interference Aware Genetic Algorithm based VM Allocation Policy for Cloud Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diversified systems hosted on cloud infrastructure have to work increasingly on physical servers. Cloud applications running on physical machines require diverse resources. The resource requirements of cloud applications are fluctuating based on the resource intensity of the applications. The multi-tenancy of Cloud servers can be achieved based on effective resource utilization. The optimum resource utilization, maximum service level agreement, and minimization of interference are the major objectives to be achieved. Using live Virtual Machine (VM) migration techniques cloud resources can be utilized efficiently. But the migrated VMs can interfere with the ongoing applications on the targeted server which may lead to the service level agreement violation (SLAV) and performance degradation. To resolve this issue, understanding the current state of cloud hosts before the allocation of newly migrated VM is necessary. This paper presents Interference Attentive Genetic Algorithm (IAGA) based VM allocation strategy to achieve the aforementioned objectives. The proposed IAGA policy has outperformed existing policies for quantifiable performance metrics such as energy consumed by cloud systems, count of hosts shut down, average SLAV, and count of VM migrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it