A Novel Surrogate-Based Approach to Yield Estimation and Optimization of Microwave Structures Using Combined Quadratic Mappings and Matrix Transfer Functions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yield estimation and yield-driven design optimization play important roles in microwave design. Existing surrogate-based yield estimation/optimization methods need to develop separate surrogate models or a large surrogate model with high complexity to deal with multiport problems, which is computationally inefficient. This article proposes a novel surrogate-based method to expedite yield estimation/optimization of multiport microwave structures using combined quadratic mappings and matrix-valued transfer functions. For multiport structures, the responses of different transfer functions corresponding to different pairs of input–output ports are computed with separate residues, while the responses of transfer functions for all pairs of input–output ports are computed with a common set of poles. Taking advantage of this, we propose to formulate a set of quadratic functions to map the relationship between the separate residues and statistical/geometrical parameters while employing merely one quadratic function to map the relationship between the common poles and statistical/geometrical parameters. The resultant mappings together with the matrix-format transfer function form an efficient surrogate to expedite the yield estimation and optimization processes for microwave structures. Compared with existing surrogate-based methods, the proposed method can achieve similar yield estimation accuracy in a shorter time due to fewer electromagnetic (EM) simulations. Three microwave structures are used to demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method. Based on accurate yield estimations, we further perform yield-driven design optimization incorporating the proposed surrogate for all the three examples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".