MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285308978 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2022.3175758

A Novel Approach to the Extraction of Key Points From 3-D Rigid Point Cloud Using 2-D Images Transformation

2022· article· en· W4285308978 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Shanghai
KeywordsPoint cloudTransformation (genetics)Key (lock)Computer scienceTransformation matrixRigid transformationGeometric transformationArtificial intelligencePoint (geometry)Matrix (chemical analysis)Image (mathematics)Cloud computingComputer visionAlgorithmMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most traditional methods for extracting key points from the 3D point cloud are based on the geometric features of points and they pose problems such as low accuracy. In order to solve these problems, this paper proposes a novel approach based on 2D image mapping, making it able to achieve highly accurate localization of key points. Specifically, it works as follows: input images are first selected for Harris corner detection; the three pairs of marker points of the images and the point cloud are then selected to calculate the transformation matrix T between them; next, the image key points are mapped onto the three-dimensional points through the transformation matrix T, for which the extraction of key points is achieved. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm is able to greatly improve the extraction accuracy of key points in comparison with traditional algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it