An Automatic Architecture Designing Approach of Convolutional Neural Networks for Road Surface Conditions Image Recognition: Tradeoff between Accuracy and Efficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Convolutional neural network (CNN) is a promising image recognition technique for winter road surface condition (RSC), a measure that is crucial for winter maintenance operations. In the past, researchers have designed RSC CNN models that displayed acceptable results but did so focusing solely on obtaining high classification accuracy without any consideration for efficiency. Furthermore, when it comes to model development itself, architecture design requires expertise in CNN as well as rich knowledge in the investigated problem itself. To rectify these issues, this paper proposes an innovative approach to automatically design RSC CNN architecture without compromising classification accuracy. The proposed approach uses a weighted sum method, which provides the freedom of choosing relative importance level between accuracy and efficiency. Once the relative importance has been set, one of the most successful and widely adopted heuristics, namely, simulated annealing (SA), is employed to generate (sub)optimal solutions. Results show that both accuracy and efficiency of the automatically generated CNNs are better or at least comparable to the two selected state-of-the-art CNN models, ResNet50 and MobileNet, achieving as high as 93.44% classification accuracy. Ultimately, the outcome of this study fills the gap in existing CNN design methods that do not consider the tradeoff between accuracy and efficiency while providing insight into the effect varying architectures have on CNN model performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".