Efficient Spike Encoding Algorithms for Neuromorphic Speech Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spiking Neural Networks are known to be very effective for neuromorphic processor implementations, achieving orders of magnitude improvements in energy efficiency and computational latency over traditional deep learning approaches. Comparable algorithmic performance was recently made possible as well with the adaptation of supervised training algorithms to the context of spiking neural networks. However, information including audio, video, and other sensor-derived data are typically encoded as real-valued signals that are not well-suited to spiking neural networks, preventing the network from leveraging spike timing information. Efficient encoding from real-valued signals to spikes is therefore critical and significantly impacts the performance of the overall system. To efficiently encode signals into spikes, both the preservation of information relevant to the task at hand as well as the density of the encoded spikes must be considered. In this paper, we study four spike encoding methods in the context of a speaker independent digit classification system: Send on Delta, Time to First Spike, Leaky Integrate and Fire Neuron and Bens Spiker Algorithm. We first show that all encoding methods yield higher classification accuracy using significantly fewer spikes when encoding a bio-inspired cochleagram as opposed to a traditional short-time Fourier transform. We then show that two Send On Delta variants result in classification results comparable with a state of the art deep convolutional neural network baseline, while simultaneously reducing the encoded bit rate. Finally, we show that several encoding methods result in improved performance over the conventional deep learning baseline in certain cases, further demonstrating the power of spike encoding algorithms in the encoding of real-valued signals and that neuromorphic implementation has the potential to outperform state of the art techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".