MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285821268 · doi:10.1109/lsens.2022.3190890

Extended Kalman Filter State Estimation for Aerial Continuum Manipulation Systems

2022· article· en· W4285821268 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtended Kalman filterKalman filterControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceNonlinear systemEncoderControl engineeringState (computer science)Invariant extended Kalman filterArtificial intelligenceEngineeringAlgorithmControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary goal of this letter is to address the state estimation problem for dual-arm tendon-driven aerial continuum manipulation systems (ACMSs). While the state estimation problem for conventional rigid aerial manipulation systems (AMSs) has been addressed, parameter estimation remains a significant challenge for the recently introduced ACMS platform. Compared to AMSs that utilize arms’ encoder data, ACMSs with flexible arms are not equipped with such sensors. As a result of the requirement for external sensors such as vision systems, measurement challenges may arise in ACMSs cases. Additionally, the dynamics of ACMSs are substantially more complicated, coupled, and nonlinear, posing additional barriers to tackling the estimating problem at hand. This letter proposes integrating deep neural networks with the extended Kalman filter (EKF) technique to enable real-time applications of the method. Simulation results demonstrate the performance of the suggested learning-based EKF approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it