VEMPIC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The comprehensive visual modeling of fluid motion has historically been a challenging task, due in no small part to the difficulties inherent in geometries that are non-manifold, open, or thin. Modern geometric cut-cell mesh generators have been shown to produce, both robustly and quickly, workable volumetric elements in the presence of these problematic geometries, and the resulting volumetric representation would seem to offer an ideal infrastructure with which to perform fluid simulations. However, cut-cell mesh elements are general polyhedra that often contain holes and are non-convex; it is therefore difficult to construct the explicit function spaces required to employ standard functional discretizations, such as the Finite Element Method. The Virtual Element Method (VEM) has recently emerged as a functional discretization that successfully operates with complex polyhedral elements through a weak formulation of its function spaces. We present a novel cut-cell fluid simulation framework that exactly represents boundary geometry during the simulation. Our approach enables, for the first time, detailed fluid simulation with "in-the-wild" obstacles, including ones that contain non-manifold parts, self-intersections, and extremely thin features. Our key technical contribution is the generalization of the Particle-In-Cell fluid simulation methodology to arbitrary polyhedra using VEM. Coupled with a robust cut-cell generation scheme, this produces a fluid simulation algorithm that can operate on previously infeasible geometries without requiring any additional mesh modification or repair.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.400 | 0.213 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".