MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286646196 · doi:10.5325/comeperf.19.1.0040

Irrepresentable Corporealities: The Staging of <i>Las paredes oyen</i> in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries

2022· article· en· W4286646196 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueComedia Performance · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Spanish Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbodied cognitionNewspaperVariety (cybernetics)Perspective (graphical)HistoryPeriod (music)ArtSociologyAestheticsPhilosophyMedia studiesVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Juan Ruiz de Alarcón’s Las paredes oyen is an exceptional comedia in that it captures the embodied experience of living with a physically marked body and it does so from the perspective of a disabled author. Cultural and social attitudes towards deviant corporealities, however, have prevented the staging of the leading part, Don Juan, as physically marked, from the play’s first staging in 1618 to the last third of the twentieth century. This article reconstructs the material circumstances in which Las paredes oyen has been historically staged, from 1829 to 1975, in continental Europe, Mexico, and Canada, and discusses the logic behind not staging Don Juan’s body as deviant in each production during this period. For this reconstruction, this study avails itself of a variety of archival sources, from newspaper ads and articles to programs, and rehearsal copies of the play.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it