MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286717422 · doi:10.4028/p-u6g3p6

Failure Prediction of Automotive Components Utilizing a Path Independent Forming Limit Criterion

2022· article· en· W4286717422 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Reliability and Analysis Research
Canadian institutionsVolvo (Canada)
FundersBlekinge Tekniska HögskolaVINNOVA
KeywordsAutomotive industryLimit (mathematics)Transformation (genetics)Path (computing)Fuel efficiencyComponent (thermodynamics)Production (economics)Automotive engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringReliability engineeringMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An area in the automotive industry that receives a lot of attention today is the introduction of lighter and more advanced material grades in order to reduce carbon emissions, both during production and through reduced fuel consumption. As the complexity of the introduced materials and component geometries increases, so does the need for more complex failure prediction approaches. A proposed path-independent failure criterion, based on a transformation of the limit curve into an alternative evaluation space, is investigated. Initially, the yield criterion used for this transformation of the limit curve was investigated. Here it was determined that the criterion for the transformation could not be decoupled from the material model used for the simulation. Subsequently, the approach using the transformed limit curve was tested on an industrial case from Volvo Cars, but a successful failure prediction was not obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it