MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286817176 · doi:10.1007/s41060-022-00343-y

Semantic enhanced Markov model for sequential E-commerce product recommendation

2022· article· en· W4286817176 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data Science and Analytics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRecommender Systems and Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov chainStochastic matrixComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Markov modelRecommender systemProduct (mathematics)Information retrievalData miningTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To model sequential relationships between items, Markov Models build a transition probability matrix $$\mathbf {P}$$ of size $$n \times n$$ , where n represents number of states (items) and each matrix entry $$p_{(i,j)}$$ represents transition probabilities from state i to state j. Existing systems such as factorized personalized Markov chains (FPMC) and fossil either combine sequential information with user preference information or add the high-order Markov chains concept. However, they suffer from (i) model complexity: an increase in Markov Model’s order (number of states) and separation of sequential pattern and user preference matrices, (ii) sparse transition probability matrix: few product purchases from thousands of available products, (iii) ambiguous prediction: multiple states (items) having same transition probability from current state and (iv) lack of semantic knowledge: transition to next state (item) depends on probabilities of items’ purchase frequency. To alleviate sparsity and ambiguous prediction problems, this paper proposes semantic-enabled Markov model recommendation (SEMMRec) system which inputs customers’ purchase history and products’ metadata (e.g., title, description and brand) and extract products’ sequential and semantic knowledge according to their (i) usage (e.g., products co-purchased or co-reviewed) and (ii) textual features by finding similarity between products based on their characteristics using distributional hypothesis methods (Doc2vec and TF-IDF) which consider the context of items’ usage. Next, this extracted knowledge is integrated into the transition probability matrix $$\mathbf {P}$$ to generate personalized sequential and semantically rich next item recommendations. Experimental results on various E-commerce data sets exhibit an improved performance by the proposed model

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it