Selective Medical Image Encryption Using Polynomial-Based Secret Image Sharing and Chaotic Map
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The progressive development in telecommunication and networking technologies has led to the increased popularity of telemedicine usage, which involves the storage and transfer of medical images and related information. Recently, trust and privacy in the telemedicine system have attracted many researchers to investigate these topics. In medical image applications, selective image encryption plays an important role as it reduces computational cost and time. Therefore, a safe and efficient selective image encryption algorithm is designed in this work. In particular, the predetermined region of the original image data is encrypted to reduce the encryption/decryption time and the computational complexity of processing the huge image data. The image processing techniques are used to divide the image into a region of interest (ROI) and a region of non-interest (RONI), and then the more important component of the ROI is encrypted using a polynomial-based secret image sharing (SIS) and a chaotic map system. These techniques produce a test image cipher that has good confusion and diffusion properties. The experimental result shows that the Polynomial-based SIS and the chaotic image encryption are effectively performed for diffusion and confusion, which are crucial for concealment. According to the security research findings, sensitive encryption and decryption systems are extremely reliant on any improvement in the key. The encryption solution is sufficiently broad to withstand brute force attacks. Thus, protection may become an issue during the transmission of medical images via a network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it