MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287379005 · doi:10.2147/tacg.s364543

Utility of Measuring Fetal Cavum Septum Pellucidum (CSP) Width During Routine Obstetrical Ultrasound for Improving Diagnosis of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: A Case-Control Study

2022· article· en· W4287379005 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Application of Clinical Genetics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSeptum pellucidumFetusAnatomyPregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To evaluate the utility of measuring fetal cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) width during routine, mid-pregnancy ultrasound for improving diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome amongst fetuses with and without conotruncal anomalies. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study (2005– 2016). Fetuses and newborns with 22q11.2 deletion and/or conotruncal cardiac anomalies were identified using a regional, clinical database. A control group was assembled in a 2:1 ratio to create three groups for comparison: i) 22q11.2 deletion syndrome; ii) isolated conotruncal anomalies; and iii) controls. Eligibility was restricted to those with stored ultrasound images between 18– 22 weeks’ gestation and a minimum biparietal diameter of 40 mm. Post-processing measurement of CSP width was performed in a standardized fashion by two blinded and independent study personnel. Descriptive and inferential statistics, regression modeling, and receiver operator curves (ROC) were used to compare outcomes between groups and evaluate sensitivity/specificity of CSP width as a marker of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Results: Twenty-nine cases of 22q11.2 deletion and 64 cases of isolated conotruncal anomalies were matched to 186 healthy controls. Cases with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome had significantly larger CSP widths (5.36 mm; SD=1.2) compared to those with isolated conotruncal anomalies (3.75 mm; SD=1.11) and healthy controls (2.93 mm; SD=0.57; p < 0.0001). There was no difference in CSP width amongst those with 22q11.2 deletion irrespective of the presence/absence of a conotruncal anomaly ( p =0.362), or by type of conotruncal anomaly ( p =0.211). Using a CSP width cutoff > 4.3 mm, fetuses with 22q11.2 deletion can be accurately identified with good sensitivity (89.7%) and specificity (84%). Conclusion: Fetuses with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome have dilated CSPs when compared to those with isolated conotruncal anomalies or controls. Because CSP dilation can be evaluated during routine mid-pregnancy ultrasound using standard images of the fetal head, measurement could easily be incorporated to enhance prenatal diagnosis of this phenotypically diverse condition. Keywords: DiGeorge syndrome, 22q11 microdeletion, cavum septum pellucidum, prenatal diagnosis, fetal ultrasound, neurosonography

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it