Framework for Fast Scalable BNN Inference Using GoogleNet and Transfer Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efficient and accurate object detection in video and image analysis is one of the major beneficiaries of the advancement in computer vision systems with the help of deep learning. With the aid of deep learning, more powerful tools evolved, which are capable to learn high-level and deeper features and thus can overcome the existing problems in traditional architectures of object detection algorithms. The work in this thesis aims to achieve high accuracy in object detection with good real-time performance. In the area of computer vision, a lot of research is going into the area of detection and processing of visual information, by improving the existing algorithms. The binarized neural network has shown high performance in various vision tasks such as image classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation. The Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology database (MNIST), Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR), and Street View House Numbers (SVHN) datasets are used which is implemented using a pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) that is 22 layers deep. Supervised learning is used in the work, which classifies the particular dataset with the proper structure of the model. In still images, to improve accuracy, Googlenet is used. The final layer of the Googlenet is replaced with the transfer learning to improve the accuracy of the Googlenet. At the same time, the accuracy in moving images can be maintained by transfer learning techniques. Hardware is the main backbone for any model to obtain faster results with a large number of datasets. Here, Nvidia Jetson Nano is used which is a graphics processing unit (GPU), that can handle a large number of computations in the process of object detection. Results show that the accuracy of objects detected by the transfer learning method is more when compared to the existing methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".