Detecting approximate replicate components of a high-dimensional random vector with latent structure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-dimensional feature vectors are likely to contain sets of measurements that are approximate replicates of one another. In complex applications, or automated data collection, these feature sets are not known a priori, and need to be determined. This work proposes a class of latent factor models on the observed, high-dimensional, random vector X∈Rp, for defining, identifying and estimating the index set of its approximately replicate components. The model class is parametrized by a p×K loading matrix A that contains a hidden sub-matrix whose rows can be partitioned into groups of parallel vectors. Under this model class, a set of approximate replicate components of X corresponds to a set of parallel rows in A: these entries of X are, up to scale and additive error, the same linear combination of the K latent factors; the value of K is itself unknown. The problem of finding approximate replicates in X reduces to identifying, and estimating, the location of the hidden sub-matrix within A, and of the partition H of its row index set H. Both H and H can be fully characterized in terms of a new family of criteria based on the correlation matrix of X, and their identifiability, as well as that of the unknown latent dimension K, are obtained as consequences. The constructive nature of the identifiability arguments enables computationally efficient procedures, with consistency guarantees. Furthermore, when the loading matrix A has a particular sparse structure, provided by the errors-in-variable parametrization, the difficulty of the problem is elevated. The task becomes that of separating out groups of parallel rows that are proportional to canonical basis vectors from other, possibly dense, parallel rows in A. This is met under a scale assumption, via a principled way of selecting the target row indices, guided by the successive maximization of Schur complements of appropriate covariance matrices. The resulting procedure is an enhanced version of that developed for recovering general parallel rows in A. It is also computationally efficient, consistent. It has immediate applications to latent space overlapping clustering and the estimation of loading matrices that satisfy a canonical parametrization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it