MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AI-based Inter-Tower Communication Networks: First approach

2022· article· en· W4287847194 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
FundersEusko Jaurlaritza
KeywordsComputer scienceInteractivityInterference (communication)Convolutional neural networkArtificial neural networkChannel (broadcasting)TowerDigital televisionArtificial intelligenceDeep neural networksDistributed computingComputer networkTelecommunicationsMultimediaEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated by the need to offer large amounts of data, user interactivity, and other requirements to enhance user experience, digital TV standards like ATSC 3.0 have evolved significantly. Particularly, in the case of ATSC 3.0, In-band Distribution Link (IDL) and Inter Tower Communication Networks (ITCN) have been proposed, among other novelties. These technologies imply the implementation of In-Band Full-Duplex (IBFD) communications, which increase the overall network capacity but have to manage strong self-interference signals. In this paper, an artificial intelligence technique based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) is proposed to perform the cleaning of the loopback channel estimation. Moreover, computer-based simulations have been carried out, and methods proposed in previous papers are compared to Neural Networks (NN). Results indicate that NNs show a greater cleaning capacity than the previously mentioned techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it