MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288010178 · doi:10.1007/s42399-022-01233-x

Cystatin C as Predictor of Long-Term Mortality in Elderly: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2022· review· en· W4288010178 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCystatin CMeta-analysisPopulationSystematic reviewCohort studyCohortInternal medicineMortality rateRisk of mortalityRenal functionMEDLINEGerontologyDemographyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Prediction of mortality in growing aged population will offer several benefits for health sector. Cystatin C, which has long been known as biomarker to more accurately evaluate glomerular filtration rate in elderly, has also been shown to predict mortality from several studies. Studies regarding its predictive ability were vastly varied, and there has not been systematic review to examine its ability in predicting long-term mortality in elderly population. This study aimed to evaluate cystatin C performance as predictor for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among elderly population. A systematic review of prospective cohort studies was performed. Literature searching was done in major databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and ProQuest. Manual searching was also performed. Inclusion criteria were studies involving elderly age 65 or older, cystatin C serum levels available, all-cause mortality as outcome, and 5-year minimum of follow-up. Study selection was performed according to PRISMA algorithm. Newcastle–Ottawa scale for cohort study was used to assess primary studies’ quality and risk of bias. Study results were presented in descriptive tables and forest plot. Initial searching revealed 609 hits with 12 studies eligible for the review: five studies evaluated all-cause mortality, three studies evaluated cardiovascular mortality, and four studies evaluated both. Meta-analysis showed that high cystatin C levels are increasing risk of long-term all-cause mortality [( HR : 1.74 (95% CI : 1.48–2.04); p < 0.0001)] and cardiovascular mortality [ HR : 2.01 (95% CI : 1.63–2.47); p < 0.0001)]. The prognostic ability of cystatin C was considerably moderate [ AUC 0.70 (95% CI : 0.68–0.72); p = 0.02]. Cystatin C was able to predict long-term mortality in elderly population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0300.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.275
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it