MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288086494 · doi:10.19189/map.2017.omb.293

Seasonal and inter-annual variability of carbon dioxide exchange at a boreal peatland in north-east European Russia

2019· article· en· W4288086494 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMires and Peat · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeatBorealCarbon dioxideEnvironmental scienceClimatologyPhysical geographyGeographyEcologyGeologyBiologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although peatlands cover about 10 % of north-east European Russia, few publications report carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes in the tundra and middle taiga peatlands of this region. In this study the CO2 balance of a boreal peatland in the Komi Republic was determined using the eddy covariance method, for the summer periods (10 June to 10 September) of 2012 and 2013. Monthly totals of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) varied significantly over the two years. The total net CO2 flux from the atmosphere to the peatland was 30 % greater in June 2013 than during the same month in 2012. The difference for July was smaller. In 2012 the total CO2 flux in August was 29 % higher, and in September it was 2.4 times lower, than in 2013. Despite the differences in seasonal dynamics of NEE between 2012 and 2013, the mean monthly indicators of gas exchange in the peatland ecosystem were mostly similar. Maximum values of gross photosynthesis (Pgross) and ecosystem respiration (Reco) were observed in July, which is the period of maximum development of the green biomass of plants. The CO2 fluxes were constrained by the precipitation and temperature regimes. During the drought of 2013, Pgross and Reco were mostly influenced by the incidence of precipitation. The peatland was a CO2 sink during both growing seasons and, in June–September 2012, it sequestered 317.66 g m-2 of CO2, which is 10.5 % more than during the same period in 2013. Our results are broadly comparable with measurements in similar peatland ecosystems across northern Europe and south-east Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it