MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288391585 · doi:10.1109/tase.2022.3188415

On Connected Autonomous Vehicles With Unknown Human Driven Vehicles Effects Using Transmissibility Operators

2022· article· en· W4288391585 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdelrahman Khalil, Khaled F. Aljanaideh, Mohammad Al Janaideh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransmissibility (structural dynamics)PlatoonRobotControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Stability (learning theory)Control engineeringEngineeringFault detection and isolationComputer scienceSimulationReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Actuator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study proposes an algorithm for fault detection and mitigation of mixed autonomous and human-driven vehicle platoons based on transmissibility identification. This work is motivated by the fact that on-road human-drivers’ behaviour is unknown and difficult to be predicted. Transmissibility operators are mathematical operators that relate one subset of outputs to another in the same system. The transmissibility superiority is represented in the in-dependency on the system excitation signals. We reformulate the system dynamics to render the system inputs, external disturbances, as well as the human-drivers’ behaviour along with any other nonlinearities as independent excitation signals on the system. Therefore, the transmissibility operators become independent of the human-drivers’ behaviour and robust against external disturbances. Transmissibilities are then applied to detect and localize physical and cyber faults within the platoon. Then these faults are mitigated using a transmissibility-based sliding mode controller. The controller stability and the string stability are investigated while the controller is active and the faults are mitigated. We validate the proposed algorithm on a model of the platoon obtained using the bond graph approach. Moreover, we apply the proposed algorithm experimentally to a platoon consisting of three robots (i.e. two autonomous robots and a human-driven robot), that is connected using wireless communications.Note to Practitioners—The existence of connected autonomous vehicles depends greatly on the smooth transition between the current on-road human-driven vehicles to autonomous vehicles. The typical methods of securing dynamic systems depend on estimating the system behaviour and responses. Increasing the number of autonomous vehicles on roads necessitates the typical securing techniques to estimate the human-drivers’ behaviour. Thus, securing the connected autonomous vehicles during this transition is challenging since the on-road human-driver behavior is unknown and difficult to be estimated. Moreover, connected autonomous vehicles should adapt to their environment while maintaining their role within the autonomous platoon. This adaptation includes adapting to the unknown human-driver behaviour. This inspired the authors to develop the proposed transmissibility-based fault mitigation. The proposed technique is shown to be able to handle unknown human-driver behaviors, different driving conditions such as road irregularities and different weather conditions, and different physical and cyber faults (i.e., in the vehicles or in the communication links). The platoon stability is then investigated while the faults are mitigated, and shown to guarantee the platoon stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and EngineeringSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207