MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288434585 · doi:10.1061/9780784484302.003

Using Machine Learning Techniques to Optimize Infrastructure Investment for the Water Distribution Network

2022· article· en· W4288434585 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2022 · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsRegional Municipality of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality (philosophy)Investment (military)Service (business)Risk analysis (engineering)Artificial intelligenceReliability engineeringEngineeringBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To mitigate the disruptions caused by pipe failures, water utility managers must be able to anticipate network degradation in the short to medium term. Unfortunately, predicting this deterioration can be a highly intricate and uncertain endeavor. The main culprit for this inherent complexity is the fact that a water main wear rate depends on its physical and structural characteristics but also on environmental and operational factors. In nearly all cases, the number of possible parameter combinations makes highly vulnerable pipes extremely difficult, if not impossible, to find with a manual approach. Furthermore, many studies have shown that modeling a group of pipes, or cohorts, which share similar characteristics improves the prediction of a distribution network’s deterioration. A more computational and data-driven solution seems to represent the best way to extract this valuable information efficiently. Artificial intelligence and unsupervised learning algorithms possess the advantage to identify the pipe cohorts that are most at risk of failure and the conditions under which network failures occur from historical data. Once these vulnerable groups are identified, it allows utility managers (1) to have a better understanding of the network’s degradation over time, (2) to tailor inspection plans and replacement programs, and (3) to optimize water main investments in order to provide an improved level of service. The Region of Peel (Canada) has made investments in the past to collect good quality data for water main breaks and associated factors. And as such, the Region of Peel is faced with the increasing challenge of water main breaks and the resulting disruption to Peel residents and businesses and, in an attempt to meet council-approved service levels, the Region intends to use innovative methods to plan and optimize strategic investment in the water distribution network. Staff plans to use this predictive modeling information to plan water main inspection and replacement programs and optimize investments in the water main replacement program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it