MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289261281 · doi:10.1016/j.ijft.2022.100188

Numerical investigation of thermal losses within an internal gear train submerged in a multiphase flow and enclosed in a rotating casing

2022· article· en· W4289261281 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Thermofluids · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsCasingPinionChurningMechanicsRotational speedThermalTorqueEngineeringCylinderMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringPhysicsMeteorologyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents results of a numerical study of thermal losses generated within an internal gear train consisting of a pinion and an annular gear. The gear train is submerged in a multiphase flow of Air and Oil and enclosed within a horizontal rotating cylinder (casing) attached to the annular gear. The casing rotates at a constant speed and exchanges heat through thermal radiation and natural convection to the ambient air. The study has been carried out using KISSsys and KISSsoft computer software. Numerical results have been validated using published experimental data. The maximum deviation is about 9.3%. The effects of several operating parameters; including the casing rotational speed (N), the torque (ζ) and the oil level (OV) on the various thermal losses generated within the gear train have been investigated. The effects of N, ζ and OV have been investigated in the following ranges: 20–160 rpm, 13–100 N.m, and 0–100%, respectively. The types of thermal losses considered in the present study are the churning, the meshing and the bearing losses. The gear ratio used in the present study is 4.45, therefore, the pinion gear rotational speed varied from 90 to 712 rpm. The present results indicated that increasing the rotational speed or the torque increases the thermal losses within the gear train. Increasing the oil level leads to an increase in the churning losses, up to a specific value of OV of about 31%, above which churning losses remained constant. The oil level at the 31% OV value is the oil level required to just submerge the pinion gear. Increasing the casing rotational speed enhanced the rate of heat transfer to the ambient air which improved the overall thermal performance of the gear train by about 12% at N = 460 rpm, compared to the stationary casing case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it