MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289292881 · doi:10.1515/9781474423298

The Edinburgh Companion to Political Realism

2018· book· en· W4289292881 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEdinburgh University Press eBooks · 2018
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations and Foreign Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealismPoliticsInternational relationsForeign policyPolitical scienceNationalismNormativeLawHistoryPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first reference work to explore the 2000-year history of political realism and reassess its place in today’s world Download an ebook of the chapter abstracts and notes on contributors (pdf) Political realism is a highly diverse body of international relations theory. This substantial reference work examines political realism in terms of its history, its scientific methodology and its normative role in international affairs. Split into three sections, it covers the 2000-year canon of realism: the different schools of thought, the key thinkers and how it responds to foreign policy challenges faced by individual states and globally. It brings political realism up-to-date by showing where theory has failed to keep up with contemporary problems and suggests how it can be applied and adapted to fit our new, globalised world order. Key Features The first volume to offer a full, balanced guide to Political Realism: its history and its normative role in international affairs Covers the main thinkers, from Thucydides through Niccolò Machiavelli to Isaiah Berlin Engages with the major foreign policy issues of our times, such as strategic deterrence, nationalism, terrorism, cyber security, climate change, the open society and religion Considers political realism in non-Western contexts, including Israel, Russia and China Includes political realism’s ground-up growth and interpretation outwith Western contexts Contributors Uriel Abulof , Tel-Aviv University, Israel. Christopher Adair-Toteff , Zeppelin University, Germany. Erica Benner , Yale University, USA. John Bew , King’s College London, UK. Todd Breyfogle , Aspen Institute, Washington, D.C., USA. Joshua Cherniss , Georgetown University, USA. Alan Chong , S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Singapore. Lindsay P. Cohn , U.S. Naval War College, USA. Kody W. Cooper , University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, USA. Marzieh Kouhi Esfahani , Durham University, UK. Markus Fischer , California State University, Fullerton, USA. Richard Forno , University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA. Stuart Gray , Politics at Washington and Lee University, USA. Robert Howse , New York University School of Law, USA. David Martin Jones , University of Queensland, Australia and King’s College London, UK. Menno R. Kamminga , University of Groningen, Netherlands. Peter Iver Kaufman , University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and University of Richmond, USA. David Kerr , Durham University, UK. Paul Kirkland , Carthage College, Wisconsin, USA. Douglas B. Klusmeyer , American University, Washington, DC, USA. Konstantinos Kostagiannis , University of Maastricht, Netherlands. Ayelet Haimson Lushkov , University of Texas at Austin, USA. Cecelia Lynch , University of California, Irvine, USA. David Mayers , Boston University, USA. Kenneth B. McIntyre , Sam Houston State University in Huntsville, Texas, USA. Neville Morley , University of Exeter, UK. John Mueller , Mershon Center for International Security Studies and Ohio State University, USA. Masashi Okuyama , International Geopolitical Institute Japan and Aoyama Gakuin University, Japan. Samir Puri , King's College London, UK. Grace Roosevelt , Metropolitan College of New York, USA. Felix Rösch , Coventry University, UK. William E. Scheuerman , Indiana University, USA. Tim Spiekerman , Kenyon College, Ohio, USA. Peter Stirk , Durham University, UK. Tom Switzer , Centre for Independent Studies in Sydney. Zhao Tingyang , Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in Beijing, China. Jodok Troy , University of Innsbruck, Austria. Alex Wilner , Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Derek M. C. Yuen , University of Hong Kong. Rashed Uz Zaman , University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. "

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it