Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Propulsion generated by wall vibrations in the form of traveling waves was investigated. A model problem consisting of two parallel plates free to move with respect to each other was used. Vibration of one of these plates generated movement of the other plate, whose velocity was used to assess the effectiveness of such propulsion. Three types of responses were identified: a “sloshing” response for long waves, a “moving wall” response for short waves, and an “intermediate” response for in-between waves. Long and transitional waves produced propulsion of marginal interest. Short waves produced effective propulsion with the velocity of the plate increasing proportionally to the second power of the wave number and the second power of the amplitude, and approximately proportionally to the wave velocity. The vibrating wall appeared in this limit to the bulk of the fluid as a moving wall. The effectiveness of vibrations significantly increased by tilting waves. The best response for short fast waves was achieved using adjacent discrete elements spaced by about three-fourths of the wavelength. An analysis of waves of arbitrary shapes demonstrated that concentrating the vibration energy in the largest available and dominant wave number (monochromatic waves) resulted in the best system performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it